As an ex-smoker and an ex-"a-lot-of-other-things" as well, I say that coddling junkies just because it's a legal addiction is no way to run public health policy. Tobacco smoke is nasty. And it's even nastier after they put all the other stuff in it to make manufactured cigs.

Don't worry about the smokers. Nicotine junkies will find an outlet for their addiction. They always do - because they care more about their fix than about your health... or their health... or their family's health... or just about anything else.

It's the nature of addiction (insert turtle & scorpion parable here).

As to the comparison with obesity, the difference is, you have to eat to live. You don't have to smoke. But, in fact, there is a movement to get sugar, caffeine and other junk food crap out of our schools, because it's killing our kids, literally. The processed food industry is owned by the same corporations and have many of the same board members as the tobacco companies. Coincidence? Doubtful.

Ban it.  You'll do the non-smoking public, and the junkies, a favor.

Eric Oines
North Minneapolis

"One day we must come to see that peace is not merely a distant goal we seek, but that it is a means by which we arrive at that goal. We must pursue peaceful ends through peaceful means."
~ Martin Luther King Jr., Agitator



REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.


For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to