Dorie Rae Gallagher writes: If they can't learn science perhaps they can learn color theory.
Michael Atherton wrote: >And then what? I don't know anyone who makes a living on color >theory alone. I don't understand how you can assume that there >are enough jobs so that a large portion of the population can make >a living in the Arts. When I worked in advertising, most everyone >did fine arts on the side and no one made much of anything. Even >the commercial artist jobs were hard to come by and there was immense >competition for them.
So - dissecting a frog or solving a math problem is going to get someone a job too? I think not. Common Michael that argument doesn't fly. Yes I learned color theory and all the right science stuff - I'm much happier doing this than when I was doing scientific research. You mentioned working in advertising - that is a for profit business - so you are seeing one side jobs in the arts. I work in the nonprofit arts world here in Minneapolis - and whether artists make a living as fine artists (which some do) or have to supplement with other income so what? They are inspired individuals who also contribute to the community be it in the arts, socially or financially. And some of them learned here right in these very schools! So they are not as left brained as someone like you - but that doesn't make one better than the other. That is what you are implying isn't it? If you want facts (which you seem to like) contact the MN Citizens for the Arts to get statistics about the arts - financial impact, jobs, livability issues etc. it's pretty inpressive stuff.
I will totally agree with Dorie Rae that there are children who learn differently - some will get turned on by science, some arts, etc. I will agree with you that children have to unlearn selfishness - hey, but here is where the arts do a great job!!!! They have to work on a group project for example, share supplies and ideas. Voile - another reason for the arts in our schools. Michael - it seems as though you view the schools as being a place to teach and train children like cookie cutter shapes and NOT as individuals with different needs and/or desires. School is also about opportunities to have different experiences through learning - a parent hopes that through this their child will eventually find their muse.
I moved to Minneapolis for the simple fact that is has one of the best arts and cultural communities in the nation. I know my science background changed my thinking - but my way isn't the only way. I certainly wouldn't want it any other way in my daughter's school - she loves science and math (she loves school) but she REALLY loves the arts. Why squash that learning experience, which shows paths to other aspects of learning ...
Shall I talk about the artist residency we did at Winonah Community School doing book arts to learn and improve math skills? It was highly successful - I need say no more ...
Liz Greenbaum Longfellow
-- Elizabeth Greenbaum Director ArtiCulture www.articulture.org 612.729.5151
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
