[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> The problem is that the suburbs and exurbs
> are already dumping their social problems into the cities for us to
> pay for.  

It's not clear to me how suburbs "dump their social problems into the 
cities for (city taxpayers) to pay for."  Can you provide some examples?

I wholly support the fact that the vast majority of social services are 
funded via state and county funds rather than municipal funds since it 
amortizes those societal costs across a broader spectrum og population.  I 
would also agree that there are disproportionately more impoverished who 
live in the cities than the suburbs (but disagree when others attribute 
this to a conscious conspiratorial set of actions).

This is the first I've read that the suburbs have social problems that are 
somehow transferred to the cities ...  or p'haps you misspoke (er, 
mistyped). 

Rick Mons
     Tanglewood - Shoreview 
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to