Sean,
Extremely well said.
While I am glad that the city did get concessions by pursuing the course of action that they did, I agree that there is a complete lack of vision on this whole problem of 35W south from downtown.
Why not extend an exclusive BRT lane all the way downtown? As soon as those BRT buses hit 46th street, they are going to be in the same congestion as everyone else. Besides.. are the people between 62 and downtown not trying to drive in as well? Or is it only people in Apple Valley that need rapid transit?
But if they had the vision to extend BRT the whole way, perhaps they would have seen an even better solution staring them in the face: An LRT expansion.
Vision. We need it. I don't care if LRT is more expensive now. I don't care if it's not "next in line" for LRT expansion. It's the right solution! A stopgap solution is just that: a $240 million dollar waste of money. In the long run, LRT will be cheaper for everyone involved... and it is actually an alternative to driving more and more cars through, as you said, the busiest interchange in the state.
This pretty much says it all:
Finally, this project is not evaluated for its cumulative effect on 35W. The reconstruction is slated to run from Richfield north to 46th Street. Donât forget, however, that another reconstruction project (known as the 35W Access Project) picks up just north of 46th Street and runs for almost 20 more city blocks. The city said last August that the full reconstructed stretch must be evaluated for its impact on air, water, and noise. To claim that these projects are distinct and have no bearing on each other is misleading and a violation of federal law. Even the state now combines the $462 million projects, using the oxymoronic name of â35W Corridor Improvement Project.â
When are we going to stand back and look at the big picture? When are we going to stand and realize that every road, rail, bus and car is part of the larger system?
Unfortunately, it's probably too late to force a change to an insanely great solution at this point. I guess we're all going to settle for "good enough for now" which by the time it is finished will be: "Not good enough."
Why can't we go for insanely great?
A.J. Colianni HPDL
On Mar 18, 2005, at 10:01 PM, Sean Wherley wrote:
City officials should be congratulated for securing the stateÂs commitment to bus-rapid transit (BRT) on 35W. By refusing to approve the Crosstown Reconstruction last year, the city succeeded in getting state funding for a BRT station at 46th Street, fewer property takings, new bridges that allow for wider sidewalks, and more noise walls lining the freeway. All of that is good news.
Before getting too excited about the stateÂs decision, however, it is critical to assess the full impact of this Âvictory and understand what is about to hit south Minneapolis.
In stepping back, we realize that the $240 million Crosstown project fails to rectify traffic congestion on 35W - the stateÂs busiest corridor, fails to address flooding in Minneapolis neighborhoods lining the freeway, fails to reduce air and water pollution, fails to protect some of the most vulnerable nearby residents  the poor and people of color, and fails to assess the full impact of a highway construction project running from Richfield almost to downtown.
First, this project will not alleviate traffic congestion. When I attended a public meeting about the Crosstown Reconstruction Project last year, I asked Tom OÂKeefe of MnDOT when the proposed project would reach traffic capacity. He said: Âday one. It only makes sense; cars are like water, they fill all open spaces. As new lanes are built, cars will swarm them  making it nearly impossible to discern improved traffic flow.
Second, this project will exacerbate flooding problems. The major storm water tunnel that runs under 35W at 39th Street is already at capacity during heavy rains and will worsen after the Crosstown Reconstruction. Flooding problems for several south Minneapolis neighborhoods like Kingfield, Lyndale, and Whittier will be compounded because the project will result in more than a 58-acre increase in impervious surface.
Third, this project will harm water quality. According to the city, the Crosstown Reconstruction Âwould appear to further impair water quality of receiving waters, including the Mississippi River and Diamond Lake which are already designated by the state as Âimpaired waters, requiring further mitigation to remove pollutants. Is this project a Âvictory for the city if our main water source suffers as a result?
Fourth, this project heightens risks to the poor and people of color. As 35W widens to ten lanes under this project and Crosstown widens to as many as 13 lanes in some locations, it is the poor and people of color who are hit hardest. Look no further for an example than the apartment complex located west of 35W and immediately north of Cub Foods. This structure will be most heavily impacted as the widened freeway reaches closer to windows and doors, spreading fumes and the ever deafening drone of traffic.
Finally, this project is not evaluated for its cumulative effect on 35W. The reconstruction is slated to run from Richfield north to 46th Street. DonÂt forget, however, that another reconstruction project (known as the 35W Access Project) picks up just north of 46th Street and runs for almost 20 more city blocks. The city said last August that the full reconstructed stretch must be evaluated for its impact on air, water, and noise. To claim that these projects are distinct and have no bearing on each other is misleading and a violation of federal law. Even the state now combines the $462 million projects, using the oxymoronic name of Â35W Corridor Improvement Project.Â
I hope that state, county, and city officials will reevaluate the true benefits of this project and decide if they should hold out for something more meaningful, effective, and environmentally-conscious. The creation of a BRT lane notwithstanding, the Crosstown project almost seems Âretro in its dependence on road building and hopes for getting us around faster. I think we can do better.
Sean Wherley Kingfield
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
REMINDERS: 1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[email protected] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
