Hello All, I just wanted to weigh in on this issue as Annie has. As Annie has said, we have no official plan in front of us yet. I am undecided and am still gathering information. A few points that are important I think:
1) As mentioned before, there is wording that suggests restricted use of the land in the original purchase agreement. However, I believe it is possible to get and exception from this to allow the construction of a field. 2) I too have asked for alternatives. For instance, my first question was why not build the facility on the BF Nelson site just on the other side of the island. This site needs to be cleaned up anyway and it seemed as though it would be a good use along with the establishment of new gardens etc. while not using any additional space on the island. Course the neighbors on that side would need to be consulted. 3) There has been great concern about the potential road closure on the island. For this reason, why not put the field on the front of the building and put new parking with much increased tree planting in the lots on the back of the building and not close the road? When this was brought up to DeLaSalle, it is my understanding that the front of the building has the space for a regulation football field but not soccer. Although this is not perfect, it achieves many of DeLaSalle's stated desires of having a football field and a site for daily gym classes and may be a good compromise. I am trying to think into the future on this issue. There will be many additional housing units being built around river bringing many new residents who may have, or eventually have, children or they may simply need an area for adult sports leagues. Will this field be a gathering place for new residents that would benefit the city as a whole? Should we decrease greenspace on this island? Are their nearby sites that could achieve everyone's objectives? Some important questions. Finally, I would say that this issue has absolutely nothing to do with race as was suggested by one individual! I understand and appreciate the passion and caring of that individual for the students - it is commendable. However, this issue is a long-term planning decision for the city for a very important piece of its' downtown! To suggest anything otherwise insults the neighbors and decision makers. My hope is that the discussion will focus on 'best use' in the future. Sincerely, John Erwin Citywide Park Board Commissioner REMINDERS: 1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[email protected] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
