Michael Thompson wrote: > The Trendsetter (or any other pornographic publication) isn't > bringing women down, nor is the cabal of publishers and the > "concentrated media ownership society." Men who allow > porn to negatively impact their interactions with women are > bringing ALL of us down. But they're the ones that hold the > onus of change, not the publications they read.
While we're talking about banning pornographic publications I think that we should mention Cosmopolitan, with all those expertise articles about how to send your partner over the top. Who buys that disgusting stuff anyway? ;-) If Councilmember Samuels did call someone a pornographer I think he owes them an apology. Michael Atherton Prospect Park REMINDERS: 1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls