I dont think it is a legitimate concern that this land use agreement will result in the land going to De La Salle through adverse possession. The land with DLS/Park Board will be subject to a reciprocal use agreement so there will never be a point when DLS is using, or purporting to own that land adverse to the park board's rights. If 20 years from now DLS said "its ours, we've been using it for the statutory period" the Park Board would point to the agreement and say they've given DLS permission to use the land, therefore no adverse possession because DLS' use is not "hostile". (Not to mention they wouldnt be paying property taxes on the lot, which I think is another requirement in MN, but not sure.) Anthony Thompson Standish DLS grad -----Original Message----- From: wmmarks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected]
In the rest of Minneapolis, if a homeowner accidentally or deliberately plants his fence on his neighbor's lot and the neighbor doesn't complain within a set number of years (10 I think), the land the fence is on devolves to the homeowner. If the MPRB allows this usage, does the land revert to DLS after ten years? >WizardMarks, Central REMINDERS: 1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[email protected] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
