I read this on Netlets tonight and wanted to pass on the issues forum -- 
Thanks Liz 
for your contributions - always!

http://www.startribune.com/stories/109/5701911.html

To halt land rush on urban parks, vote Nov. 8
Last month's Star Tribune series on skyrocketing prices for property in 
northern Minnesota underscored how highly people value the chance to live near 
natural resources and places for passive and active recreation. If such 
properties 
are coveted in remote areas, imagine what public parks mean to urban dwellers 
who, unlike our friends in rural and suburban area, have yards the size of 
postage stamps if we have them at all.
With 6,400 acres containing lakes, creeks, a riverfront, playing fields, open 
spaces and 48 recreation centers, the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board 
is the largest landowner in the city. The nine-person, elected Park Board 
controls an annual budget which includes nearly $50 million in taxpayer money.
Because of this substantial budget, the stewardship and responsibility 
required of those elected to the Park Board is daunting. Park commissioners 
must be 
vigilant in protecting our much-needed open spaces and picturesque shorelines 
from the grasping hands of those seeking to create profit for the few. They 
must exercise caution when pondering long-term contracts for spaces paid for by 
the public. They must practice diligent oversight to ensure we are getting the 
best return on our tax dollar. And they must balance the public's diverse 
needs for sound environmental policy and recreational opportunities without 
overly burdening city taxpayers already reeling from cost of living increases.
A current majority on the Minneapolis Park Bard has not lived up to those 
standards. These commissioners have squandered funds on unwise, overpriced 
capital projects that have little or no public benefit, while threatening basic 
necessities like restrooms, summer park supervision and wading pools. From the 
lakes to the riverfront they have tried to remove precious park resources from 
public control or access.
The land rush on our urban parks has been held in check, but if the board's 
narrow five-member majority gains a sixth vote in November's general election, 
our parkland could be auctioned to the highest bidder (or to the 
best-connected private party in a no-bid process). And all done in the name of 
preserving 
the park system, following the Orwellian logic that to save our parks we must 
divest ourselves of them.
Park Watch (www mplsparkwatch org) is an ad hoc group that monitors the 
Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board, and tries to shine a light on its 
actions 
and policies -- a laborious but necessary function with a public body that has 
ceased to uphold such basic elements of governance as recording written meeting 
minutes. The group formed after a five-person majority faction of Minneapolis 
park commissioners voted in December 2003 to hire a superintendent who was 
not a candidate for the position and had not even interviewed. Park Watch 
supports good government and an independent park board.
Please remember to vote on Nov. 8 and elect a district park commissioner and 
three at-large, citywide park commissioners who will be accountable, govern in 
a transparent manner, reverse the course on privatizing park resources and 
provide the stewardship to keep our waters clean, our recreations centers open, 
our open spaces public and basic services maintained.  Written by: LIZ 
WIELINSKI, MINNEAPOLIS; CO-FOUNDER PARK WATCH
Katie Simon-Dastych - Cooper/ Longfellow Resident - Park District 3 
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to