Access to adequate public transportation is a right.  If you think of it in 
collective terms, we can either collectively provide for adequate 
transportation for the people living in this city or do it the way we do now, 
with most people providing for their transportation individually and clogging 
the streets and polluting the air with a plethora of private automobiles.
   Were you actually being serious or were you satirizing the position that 
adequate transportation is not a right when you said that the people in New 
Orleans who were trapped there should have come up with some "creative means" 
of solving their lack of a way of getting out of the city?  Well, I've got news 
for you.  I don't own and cannot afford an automobile and if Pararie Island 
ever explodes, I can't get out of here either.  I will be completely dependent 
on the mercies of the government to provide emergency vehicles.
   Robert Halfhill   Loring Park


http://halfhillviews.greatnow.com (SITE NOW BANNED ON AOL)

http://www.thepen.us

-- Dorothy Titus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark said:  "A large metro area needs user-friendly, cost-effective 
public transit, but to assign the word 'justice' to that goal is a very 
big stretch. It implies that that public transit is an entitlement, and 
the tax base (collective) needs to accomodate the needs in the name of 
'justice'.  It also suggests, I think, an underlying belief that nobody 
should ever be inconvenienced or have to solve problems on their own.  
Not being able to match bus schedules or LRT routes to your personal 
needs does not rise to the level of oppression."

I wonder if that was the thinking in New Orleans as well.  It certainly 
resulted in an oppressive situation for the poor who did not have cars 
and could not reach the buses to evacuate.  But perhaps they should 
have thought about that inconvenience in advance and tried to solve the 
problem on their own by some creative means.

Cities nearly always have a certain population that do not own cars 
either for convenience or because they cannot afford to.  In my 
neighborhood, 21% of those in the workforce used public transportation 
to get to work (2000 census). 27% of the population lives below the 
poverty line.  Public transportation is important.  Certainly, it is 
not a "right."  However, since it is PUBLIC transportation, it needs to 
serve the public fairly.  When significant geographic areas of the city 
have come to rely on bus service, changes in service need to take into 
account the impact it will have.  People buy their homes or live in 
areas based on the amenities that are available that are important to 
them.  It is not easy to sell your house or give up your home and find 
a new location where bus service matches your work schedule.  And it's 
really hard on the kids.

Here's a radical idea:  We have a $.50 "downtown zone" fare on Metro 
Transit that allows people to ride the bus anywhere in downtown for a 
really cheap price.  Why can't we have a "neighborhood zone" fare like 
that in poor areas where people must use public transportation to run 
local errands near their home?  Is it really fair to charge downtown 
residents and workers $.50 for a short ride while we make those in poor 
neighborhoods pay $1.25 to do their grocery shopping?

Dottie Titus
Jordan neighborhood

REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[email protected]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to