Hallo Martin, Du schriebst am Wed, 6 Nov 2013 13:56:25 +0100:
> On Wednesday 06 November 2013 13:22:31 Ivanko B wrote: > > In daily work the size of the base types should be unambiguously > > visible. ========== > > How about its replacement by explicit range defining/checking > > (possibly with the mention reversal "typedef" for simplier syntax) ? > > The same + some more (compiler) functionality.. And "reading letter" > > by default (without defining ranges). > > > What is wrong to read in a letter the word "sint32" instead of "integer"? "sint32" is unusual, while "integer" is common. This, of course, implies that the words are used with their common meanings. BTW, "int(eger)" already does imply signedness, usually (mathematically). -- -- (Weitergabe von Adressdaten, Telefonnummern u.ä. ohne Zustimmung nicht gestattet, ebenso Zusendung von Werbung oder ähnlichem) ----------------------------------------------------------- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, S. Schicktanz ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
