Hallo Martin, Du schriebst am Fri, 8 Nov 2013 19:23:43 +0100:
> Currently I prefer cardinal -> cardXX and integer -> intXX because of the > Pascal types. It would be even better if the two had same count of > characters. carXX? :-)))) Adding confusion to obscurity? Why insist on foreshortening everything when nearly every editor around offers programmability of some sort, and completion can be had for free most everywhere (even if it is often more disturbing than helpful, IMHO). Or, as another approach: Type once, paste often - if the words are lengthy, just copy one line and paste it as often as needed. Sometimes, the ability to manipulate column blocks is helpful also, it eases modification of line sections in multiple lines. And more. Which means, there's not much to gain with foreshortened identifiers, when the editors make typing easy anyway. After all, a programmer should not type most of the time, but _think_ about the structures his typing is to describe. Shouldn't he? -- -- (Weitergabe von Adressdaten, Telefonnummern u.ä. ohne Zustimmung nicht gestattet, ebenso Zusendung von Werbung oder ähnlichem) ----------------------------------------------------------- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, S. Schicktanz ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
