On Friday 08 November 2013 19:14:31 Vladislav Javadov wrote: > >> Or ord8, ord16, ord32, ord64, int8, int16, int32, int64? > > MS> Or card8, card16, card32, card64, int8, int16, int32, int64? > MS> :-) > > Why ordXX, not wordXX? Look at Context language by Andrey Hohlov.
We need a base name for unsigned numbers and a base name for signed numbers. Why do you suggest "word" for unsigned number? Currently I prefer cardinal -> cardXX and integer -> intXX because of the Pascal types. It would be even better if the two had same count of characters. carXX? :-)))) Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
