On 07/04/2013 07:10 PM, Peter Bigot wrote: > I have no information about Red Hat's toolchain other than what's been > announced here, but: > > Red Hat's MSP430 toolchain is entirely unrelated to mspgcc. I am unaware > of any information having been provided related to support for libc or > specific MCUs in this new work. While msp430mcu and msp430-libc might work > with some fiddling, it's not clear they're needed, I very much doubt > they're the intended solution, and they certainly don't incorporate any > changes to accommodate Red Hat's implementation.
There is now msp430 support in newlib: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/newlib/2013/msg00362.html Since we did a clean re-implementation of the MSP port we can't comment on the pre-existing mspgcc library solutions: We really don't know. Our plan is to support and enhance standard upstream infrastructure. For libc this means newlib. -- Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / b...@redhat.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Mspgcc-users mailing list Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
