On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Brendan Conoboy <b...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Since we did a clean re-implementation of the MSP port we can't comment > on the pre-existing mspgcc library solutions: We really don't know. Our > plan is to support and enhance standard upstream infrastructure. For > libc this means newlib. What is your plan (if any) for chip-specific header files and linker files? -p. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Mspgcc-users mailing list Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
