Remote Control sessions launched from standalone .EXE are still logged by the client in the Remote Control Activity status messages, and the permissions are still driven by the ConfigMgr Remote Control Users group membership on the target machine.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Craig Andrew (OIZ) < [email protected]> wrote: > But then there is no logging or auditing and the RBA isn’t used… is that > correct?**** > > ** ** > > *Von:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *Andre Vrankovic > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2013 07:55 > > *An:* [email protected] > *Betreff:* RE: [mssms] RE: Web remote tools**** > > ** ** > > You can use the remote tools standalone, no need to run it through the > console.**** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Craig Andrew (OIZ) > *Sent:* Thursday, 16 May 2013 3:43 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* AW: [mssms] RE: Web remote tools**** > > ** ** > > I wanted to use the console but the helpdesk guys felt it was too much for > powerusers, i.e. they can see all sorts of nodes and folders which of > course are empty when tied down to security roles. So the problem is that > although they could only see and use the objects they are supposed to, the > extra nodes and appearance of folders etc confused them. **** > > ** ** > > Here, I have some powerusers who just need to use the remote tools, but > they see the whole console structure. Any way to customize this? I know you > can’t secure folders which scopes and roles, but nodes? Any customized > consoles out there? Or are my security roles wrong?**** > > ** ** > > Thanks**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *Von:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *Murray, Mike > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 15. Mai 2013 23:33 > *An:* [email protected] > *Betreff:* RE: [mssms] RE: Web remote tools**** > > ** ** > > Yes, I know that’s an option. Just thought it would be easier to point > folks to a web page rather than install the console. Looking like the > console will be our method, though.**** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Johns, Damon (DoJ) > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 15, 2013 2:29 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [mssms] RE: Web remote tools**** > > ** ** > > Why not just setup some security scopes with your roles and lock down the > sccm environment so your techs can use the actual console. We used to use > the web remote tools but have now moved to this model. My guys can only add > users and computer's to collections and look at some of the monitoring > functions. **** > > > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: "Murray, Mike" <[email protected]> > Date: > To: [email protected] > Subject: [mssms] RE: Web remote tools **** > > Well, I was hoping for free. :)**** > > **** > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Marcum, John > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 15, 2013 1:37 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] RE: Web remote tools**** > > **** > > 1E or Flexera.**** > > **** > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Murray, Mike > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 15, 2013 2:47 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] RE: Web remote tools**** > > **** > > That’s certainly an option, but I thought it might be easier to just point > them to a web page rather than having them install the console.**** > > **** > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Dzikowski, Michael > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 15, 2013 12:18 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] RE: Web remote tools**** > > **** > > RBA and console? **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Murray, Mike > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 15, 2013 3:14 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] Web remote tools**** > > **** > > From what I’ve read, the good ole web remote tools from Ron Crumbaker may > not work so well with CM2012. Just curious if anyone has an alternative, or > has altered the old one to work in the new environment. We really loved > having this so our service desk employees could push software and remote > control.**** > > **** > > **** > > Best Regards,**** > > **** > > Mike Murray**** > > Desktop Management Coordinator - IT Support Services**** > > California State University, Chico**** > > 530.898.4357 > [email protected]**** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > ------------------------------ > > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be > protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have > received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to > this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.**** > > **** > ------------------------------ > > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be > protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have > received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to > this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.**** > > **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > ------------------------------ > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER > The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected > by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or > persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are > warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is > unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please > immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of > the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the > transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any > unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > ------------------------------ > > This message is for the designate recipient only and may contain > confidential, proprietary or otherwise private information. If you have > received it in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail immediately > and delete the original. Any review, re-transmission, disclosure, > dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, > this information by persons or entities other then the intended recipient > is prohibited and may result in legal proceedings against you. **** > > ** ** > >
