I think this thread is the wrong way around. The burden of justification should be on those in favor of building a brand new ConfigMgr infrastructure with a 4 year-old operating system.
Cheers, Trevor Sullivan <http://trevorsullivan.net/> <http://twitter.com/pcgeek86> <http://facebook.com/trevor.sullivan> <https://plus.google.com/106658223083457664096> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 6:39 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Server 2012 vs Server 2008 R2 2012 is more “performant” due to things like SMB 3.0, better resource management, and lower overhead. I’ve seen reports of folks of using the server 2012 SSIS and saving 20%+ disk space over the ConfigMgr SSIS alone. Also, 2012 won’t EOL until (at least 2022) -- yes that seems a ways off, but how many 2003 servers do folks still have running after 10 years? Answer: boat loads. J From: Trond Karstensen Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:31 AM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> For the DP role Windows Server 2012 will support PXE boot for computers/tablets with UEFI bios. From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christopher Duszynski Sent: 21. mai 2013 23:16 To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] Server 2012 vs Server 2008 R2 Is there any benefits to install SCCM 2012 SP1 on Windows Server 2012 vs. Server 2008 R2. If so can you provide me with your justification?
<<image001.gif>>
<<image002.gif>>
<<image003.gif>>
<<image004.gif>>
