No, no need for any CU to be installed, only requirement is SP1
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj822981.aspx#BKMK_PlanningR2Upgrade



On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Anand Upadhyay - Information Technology <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Trying to find same official statement for our management. We are on SP1
> and trying to figure out if R2 = all previous CUs included and feature
> enhancements.****
>
> ** **
>
> Anand ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Shane Alexander
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 26, 2013 6:23 AM
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012 R2 do you need CU3?****
>
> ** **
>
> Yep ... it's the "no official statement" bit some of us want :-)
>
> Many customers just on SP1, or plus CU1 or CU2 ... be good to know.
>
> At least 2012 has CU's ... OMG 2007 was a challenge for upgrading
> customers with so many hotfixes.
>
>
> Shane
>  ****
> ------------------------------
>
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012 R2 do you need CU3?
> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:07:14 +0100****
>
> SP1 onwards … I believe all of CU3 is in R2 but there is no official
> statement that I’ve seen that calls out 100% parity … yet.****
>
>  ****
>
> Robert - MVP****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Shane Alexander
> *Sent:* 26 October 2013 07:14
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012 R2 do you need CU3?****
>
>  ****
>
> I was looking for info on whether you should have CU3 (or any CU) before
> upgrading to R2.  Seems you just need SP1.
>
>
> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj822981.aspx#BKMK_UpgradeR2Checklist
> You cannot upgrade a site to System Center 2012 R2 Configuration Manager
> until all sites in the hierarchy run System Center 2012 Configuration
> Manager with SP1. The version of cumulative updates for Configuration
> Manager that are installed at sites is not evaluated and you can upgrade a
> System Center 2012 Configuration Manager SP1 site regardless of the
> cumulative update version that is installed, or even when no cumulative
> update is installed.
>
> But wondering ... does R2 include everything from CU3 (and KB2894539) ?
>
> All I can find is ...
>
> http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/775700a7-7642-4c4b-8a30-033c41ed52df/cu3-before-r2?forum=configmanagergeneral
>
> Shane
>  ****
> ------------------------------
>
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012 R2 do you need CU3?
> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:59:41 -0400****
>
> The post CU3 update says:****
>
>  ****
>
> *Note* These issues do not affect Microsoft System Center 2012 R2
> Configuration Manager.****
>
>  ****
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2894539 ****
>
>  ****
>
> And, CU3 says it only applies to ConfigMgr 2012 SP1****
>
>  ****
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2882125****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Spinelli, Robert J
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 24, 2013 12:52 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [mssms] SCCM 2012 R2 do you need CU3?****
>
>  ****
>
> I can’t seem to find a definitive answer.  If you install SCCM 2012 R2, do
> you still need CU3?****
>
>  ****
>
> Thank you.****
>
>  ****
>
> Robert Spinelli | CTS | GTI | 575 Washington Boulevard, Jersey City, NJ,
> 07310, United States| T: +1.201.595.6820 | C: +1.917.538.6192 |
> [email protected] <[email protected]>****
>
>  ****
>
> This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended
> as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial
> instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market
> prices, data and other information are not warranted as to completeness or
> accuracy and are subject to change without notice. Any comments or
> statements made herein do not necessarily reflect those of JPMorgan Chase &
> Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates. This transmission may contain
> information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt
> from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
> distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any
> reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this transmission and
> any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that
> might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it
> is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and
> no responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and
> affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage arising in any way from
> its use. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately
> contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in
> electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. Please refer to
> http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures for disclosures relating to
> European legal entities. ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
> THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO
> WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED,
> CONFIDENTIAL, PROPRIETARY AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW.
> No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any improper
> transmission. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
> or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution, forwarding or copying of this communication is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication by mistake, please
> notify the sender immediately by e-mail or telephone, and delete the
> original message and any electronic or printed copies of this message
> immediately. Thank you. New York Community Bancorp, Inc. ("Company")
> reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications sent through its
> networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
> sender, unless the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to
> communicate on behalf of the Company or one of its subsidiaries.
>



Reply via email to