On that link you sent does not “Hmmmm use with caution, I'm currently working 
with very large design apps (10GB+) and have mixed results distributing content 
to de-dup enabled DPs. I left a number of packages, circa 30GB worth, 
distributing over night, all were still in progress this morning. I flicked 
de-dup off and they started to complete. Maybe the lesson here is to be less 
agressive with the de-dup settings, I had it set to 0 days to de-dup 
everything. I'll reinstate later with 5-10 days” make you question whether you 
would recommend it to a client?






Sent from Windows Mail





From: Roland Janus
Sent: ‎Monday‎, ‎20‎ ‎January‎ ‎2014 ‎15‎:‎31
To: [email protected]






There are other people using it with huge savings

 

http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/f6750126-3b9e-4b1a-b83c-91e946df4890/sccmcontentlib-single-instance-storage-on-server-2012-dedup-thoughts?forum=configmanagergeneral

 

Well, everyone has to decide for themselves

 

 

 



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Paul Thomsen
Sent: Montag, 20. Januar 2014 16:05
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [mssms] Server 2012 Deduplication

 

Adam Meltzer, of Microsoft fame, says that deduplication is not supported with 
CM12 here:

 

http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/37ebee1f-bc2d-48b7-8bce-045a23e20215/sccm-2012-server-2012-dedupe?forum=configmanagergeneral

 

That’s not as official as core documentation or a corporate blog, but it’s good 
enough for me.

 

Paul Thomsen |Associate Product Manager |1E

 



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Jason Wallace
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 6:41 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [mssms] Server 2012 Deduplication

 



Roland


 


On the SOURCE folder, yes - that would be a good plan, as would the 
deduplication of VHDs both of which is not only supported but exceedingly good 
practice.  I thought that my comment was pretty explicit that I was referring 
to DPs only.


 


As for supportability I am pretty sure that there would not have been a test 
plan to test the interaction - ergo there would be no support for it.  As far 
as I know, and having asked the question directly before this should not work 
although not tested it myself.



 


Sent from Windows Mail


 



From: Roland Janus
Sent: ‎Monday‎, ‎20‎ ‎January‎ ‎2014 ‎14‎:‎32
To: [email protected]


 



Not supported says it where?

 

CM12: file based only, the exact same file twice is stored once only but for 
the library only.

Server2012: Content based and for the whole volume, also works e.g. with VHDs.

 

Use Dedup for example on the source folder of the packages…

I use it also for the content library, it squeezes even more out of it.

 

-R

 

 



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Jason Wallace
Sent: Montag, 20. Januar 2014 14:53
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [mssms] Server 2012 Deduplication

 



Matt


 


SCCM 2012 has its own dedupe mechanism for content.  It would not be supported 
or recommended to implement dedupe on DPs



 


Sent from Windows Mail


 



From: Matt Wilkinson
Sent: ‎Monday‎, ‎20‎ ‎January‎ ‎2014 ‎13‎:‎49
To: [email protected]


 



Can this work on DPs to cut down on the amount of storage needed?

Is it supported?


_____________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System on behalf
of Leeds College of Building.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
_____________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to