John I take it you are talking about app-v v VMware app virtualisation and managing of that. Yes IE can be virtualised with the VMware technology but honestly why bother.
Here's a cool round up of app v and the competition that Rory Monaghan presented recently at the app-v UK user group meet up in London http://rorymon.com/blog/index.php/app-v-user-group-uk-app-v-vs-the-competition/ > On 4 Dec 2014, at 19:33, Burke, John <[email protected]> wrote: > > but what about when it comes to the vm space. I'm guessing they were not > talking about management and more about just virtual applications and > managing those. > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff > Sent: December 4, 2014 3:15 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM 2012? > > I heard ConfigMgr had 85% at MMS. J > > Daniel Ratliff > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Murray, Mike > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 2:09 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM 2012? > > I haven’t used it, but they certainly don’t have 99% of the market share for > systems management. Last I heard ConfigMgr has something like 70% market > share there. > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Burke, John > Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:33 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [mssms] VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM 2012? > > Hi Folks, > > We haven't gotten around to putting in SCCM 2012 and VMWARE has been selling > pretty hard here. We are about to roll out the workspace client and it seems > earily familar to some of the stuff SCCM does in 2012. Does anyone know if > this is a direct competing product? Are there issues having both clients on > the boxes? > > I did ask about a bit and they said they went with VMWARE because it had 99% > of the market share and that it could virtualize IE and Microsofts version > cannot. Is that true? That seems like a pretty bad thing to be unable to > virtualize IE to get past some really junky apps. > > > > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to > which it is addressed > and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this > material/information in error, > please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. > >
