Perhaps that is the problem. This workspace looks like it's used to manage the apps and deploy it. So we will be managing the apps in several places now.
Be nice if you could manage the vmware apps as simply as they seem to be managed directly in the sccm console. I need to play around some more, but I would think the vmware stuff would even benefit from integration just based on the infrastructure and the DP's. ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland Janus Sent: December 4, 2014 4:02 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM 2012? Maybe, but check out licensing. You're not just allowed to just virtualize IE, even if they do it, it may break licensing. Actually I wouldn't compare VM and CM at all, different solution for different tasks. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Burke, John Sent: Donnerstag, 4. Dezember 2014 20:34 To: [email protected] Subject: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM 2012? but what about when it comes to the vm space. I'm guessing they were not talking about management and more about just virtual applications and managing those. ________________________________ From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: December 4, 2014 3:15 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM 2012? I heard ConfigMgr had 85% at MMS. :) Daniel Ratliff From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Murray, Mike Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 2:09 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] RE: VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM 2012? I haven't used it, but they certainly don't have 99% of the market share for systems management. Last I heard ConfigMgr has something like 70% market share there. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Burke, John Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:33 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] VMware on the way .. the workspace client VS SCCM 2012? Hi Folks, We haven't gotten around to putting in SCCM 2012 and VMWARE has been selling pretty hard here. We are about to roll out the workspace client and it seems earily familar to some of the stuff SCCM does in 2012. Does anyone know if this is a direct competing product? Are there issues having both clients on the boxes? I did ask about a bit and they said they went with VMWARE because it had 99% of the market share and that it could virtualize IE and Microsofts version cannot. Is that true? That seems like a pretty bad thing to be unable to virtualize IE to get past some really junky apps. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
