> It just would make a lot more sense to assign a pointer to
> function or a pointer to member to each list item.
You could get the pointer to a STATIC member function instead if that
helps. If you need data from the object, then you'll have to somehow
store a "this" pointer somewhere and do the following trick:
class CMyClass
{
public:
static void CallBack(void* pThis)
{
((CMyClass*)pThis)->RealCallBack();
};
void RealCallBack()
{
// do the real work here.
};
This only works if you have a good place to store the class pointer.
Perhaps in the same class that contains your control? Or do the
different items in your list go to different objects?
_______________________________________________
msvc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
See http://beginthread.com/mailman/listinfo/msvc_beginthread.com for subscription
changes, and list archive.
