> If the third is me, then I refrain to accept it! I merely
> pointed out that
> using false as the last parameter makes the loop hog the CPU.
> I'd also wait
> on the handle, to be able to set a timeout.
NOW he tells me {;v)
> They're both valid, of course, but for different cases. I can't
> see any way
> to set a timeout (that you definitely need) using GetOverlappedResult( ).
> Indeed you can't wait on something that might never happen.
OK, wait on handle it is then.
--
Jason Teagle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
msvc mailing list
[email protected]
See http://beginthread.com/mailman/listinfo/msvc_beginthread.com for
subscription changes, and list archive.
