Laurens Holst wrote:
>If the interface needed a terminator on HD2, then my current configuration
>could not possible work, for then BERT should assume HD1 not available for
>HD2 has got a terminator.
>So I have SCSI'd for quite some time without terminator, I guess.
>
>An idea is cummin' up; might this non-availability of a terminator have
>caused those errors which sometimes occurred and at last the breakdown of my
>MK-interface???
Maybe, but I can tell you I've heard lots of stories from PC-people that
had perfectly working configurations with NO terminators at all, while
others had EVERY device terminated!
So it's hard to say...
Greetz,
Patriek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ,-. ,----. ,-. TNI on the web:
| '-.| ,-. \ '-' http://www.xs4all.nl/~newimage/
Member of | ,-'| | | | ,-.
The New Image | '--' | | '-' | Check out "MSX Banzai!" at:
since 1991 `------' '-----' http://www.xs4all.nl/~newimage/MSXBanzai!/
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****
