At 10:11 PM 7/12/99 +0200, you wrote:
>>For those still telling there is no perfect msx emulator, please try
>>BrMSX... And maybe you will think differently...
>
>Stop writing this "philosophical" nonsense... There will never be a perfect
>emulator...
There is no reason why there can't be. If you can make it in digital
hardware, you can make it in software as well. It's just a matter of how
much effort you put into it.
>Some of them are getting in the right direction but... still
>they are not the same as the REAL THING!
Why?
>This conversation is probably only getting you more hits on your
>homepage...
Arnaud only said that in his opinion, BrMSX had already reached the perfect
state. If you have a problem with this conversation, blame me, not him...
And it will get him one extra hit: me downloading BrMSX. But with the
number of hits he already gets, I can hardly imagine that's the reason he
replied.
>People better buy the real thing to keep MSX going...
Is MSX just the hardware? In my opinion, when someone plays an MSX game in
an emulator, they are connected to MSX as well. Maybe not as much as when
coding a real machine in assembly, but connected nevertheless.
>(and they must not
>forget to get a subscription on XSW-Magazine!)...
Laurens wants me to read Track, you want me to read XSW...
Where does it stop? ;)
Bye,
Maarten
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****
