Re: "philosophical" view of emulation vs real thing

[Pablo Vasques Bravo-Villalba]

Laurens Holst wrote:
> I don't think that a machine which is backwards compatible
> with MSX but has other native code can still be called an MSX.

Hmmm... :) MSX1 VDP is part of MSX1 standard... V9938 is
part of MSX2 standard. V9938 is backwards compatible with
MSX1 VDP, but has other native code (it can run opcodes,
while MSX1 VDP can't -- does it can?). But... MSX2 is called
an MSX. `:)

Funny, isn't it? ;)

[]s,
Parn

P.S.: I know this is full of technical errors. Please don't
mind this too seriously. ^^

****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****