>>By the way, there was some guy (dunno where) developing an OPL3 board!!!
>>Aargh! Let us make it MoonSound-compatible and convince this guy to use
>>OPL4!!! (which can still be achieved).
>
>Why would he have to use OPL4? It would certainly be more expensive,
>because the instrument ROM costs money (copyrights) and SRAM isn't cheap
>either, especially 512K ICs. And probably the OPL3 itself is cheaper than
>OPL4.
Hum.... the actual price for 512K SRAM 70ns DIP is 160Fr (divide by 3.3 for
Dutch Gulden)
>I would have no problems as long as the OPL3 board would be compatible with
>the OPL3 part of the MoonSound, which means it would have to use the same
>I/O addresses. In that way, a single program could play music on both, FM
>only ofcourse.
>
>Bye,
> Maarten
>
>
greetings,
Martial.
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****
