> > It is only me who thinks that we need with some urgence a C or BASIC
> > compiler with the same integrated interface of Compass??
>
> Perhaps I am the only one, but really prefer the unix way, where all is
> separated, so you can use your own editor with any programming language
> and you don't have to learn the editor commands that come with the
> integrated environment.
I did it that way. TED for editing, Gen80 for compiling...
Compared to Compass: SLOWWWW (no tokenizing), and uneasy (in Compass: press
^A (or F4-Space-Space) to assemble (to disk), switch between sources with
CTRL-1/2/3/4, switch to 60 Hz with CTRL-6, load and save almost every
fileformat, from .COM to raw sector access, advanced memory management,
highly configurable,DOS or Basic shell by simply pressing shift-ESC,
quitting the shell by -again- easily pressing shift-ESC, and TONS more...
Really, I love it! And Compass 2.0 will be --> HOLY <--, faster assembling,
better shell, better debugging...).
~Grauw
--
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
email me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or ICQ: 10196372
visit the Datax homepage at http://datax.cjb.net/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet
****
