> >] It is only me who thinks that we need with some urgence a C or BASIC
> >] compiler with the same integrated interface of Compass??
> > Nobody is stopping you to make one...
> >
> > Though, I consider KUN-BASIC rather integrated with the powerfull MSX
> BASIC
> > interactive development environment. You can use the MSX BASIC IDE to
> write,
> > test, run, save and load kun-basic programs, without having the need to
> start
> > separate editors, compilers and the whole lot...
>
> The MSX BASIC environment sure has its merits, but I _really_ find the
> hassling
> with linenumbers etc backwards. An idea could be to develop a completely
> new
> MSX BASIC version (would be v5.0 or something?), which has
>
> - no linenumbers (yes!)
> - long variable names
> - user defined types
> - subroutines, procedures and functions
> - possibility to build and link libraries.
>
> An IDE could still be possible, e.g. something like the original Turbo
> Pascal
> IDE! I started thinking about it a couple of years ago, but - as with many
> ideas -
> I didn't work it out: no time, other things to do.
Most of tthese things are implemented in NestorPreter... Check it out! It's on
Nestor's page, url in my bookmarks...
Grtjs, Manuel ((m)ICQ UIN 41947405)
PS: MSX 4 EVER! (Questions? See: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/)
PPS: Visit my home page at http://bilderbeek.cjb.net/
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet
****
