--- ag0ny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, �iogo Sperb Schneider wrote:
>
> Couldn't. A MMU ensures that programs can't access
> memory locations that
> aren't theirs. It must be implemented in hardware.
> It would be funny to
> have userland programs overwrite the MMU and get
> write access to kernel
> areas.
Ok, but I still don't see how it could not be
implemented in software.
> And I think it should not be implemented in the new
> MSX. It would make
> programming MUCH harder,
Why? I thought programming in C was a well known art.
> and would be further from
> the MSX feeling.
The Microsoft unsecure feeling, you mean? C'mon...
The MSX was meant to be much superior than that.
=====
______________________________________________
�iogo Sperb Schneider - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"When I say Van Halen I mean David Lee Roth!!"
@ http://www.geocities.com/enthusiast78
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail � Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet
****
