> blah blah blah blah
> >Sorry.... We use the instrument data... Or at least I think we do...
hmm..
> >or didn't we... Damn.. That routine is so old, it's even older than
Blaffer
> >1.0.. It's the first thing i've ever written for SCC... hehe.. I'll take
a
> >look... You'll here it from me... :)))
>
> Here's the trick guys:
>
> select slot, write 63 to #9000, then read it again, if it reads 63, then
> it's most likely RAM and do the next slot, read #9900, keep the value,
> write some testvalue init, read it. If the value you read is the value you
> wrote, invert byte and test it again. This way you can make sure it's
> writeable. Write back the original value. So if #9000 had ROM behaviour
and
> #9900 has RAM behaviour in the same slot, it's most likely SCC.
>
Harhrahar.... hehe... guess what i'm doing?? hehehehe.... But if it's not
working then i don't know either... There are some modifications to this
routine, which are very strange... They sometimes don't work on my SCC's...
And THAT routine is the routine that WORKS on those SCC's where my routine
doesn't work as they WANT it to work....
hehe....
thnx. for the info BiFi, now i didn't have to type it myself...
harharhar....
btw. Already checked my message on the newsgroup?? hehe.. the one concerning
the competition of CAT?? He didn't react anymore..! heheh... Guess he was
too lame to give me some points... Hey BiFi.. Can I get some points from u??
hehe.. You even got Bonus points!!.. hehehehe... ahwell.. i'm getting way
off topic... harhar...
d-fader is happy CAT is gone... And d-fader thinks it's good to write only
english in the mailinglist and newsgroup... It keeps all MSXers a bit
together... :)))
Thanx again for the Info BiFi (although this mail is already so big, i could
as easy type it myself...)
damn... ahwell.. good-night... and think about it.. be good, give me some
points.. heheheheh... :))))
bye!
d-fader
****
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] See also http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
****
