Re: fMSX 2.3 released

[Sean Young]

On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 05:02:35PM +0000, Maarten ter Huurne wrote:
> About V9938.c: the preparations for SCREEN8 reorder worked very well, I had 
> to change only 1 line. However, SCREEN7 is harder because it puts the even 
> pixels in the lowest 64K of VRAM and the odd pixels in the highest 64K of 
> VRAM. So a pair of pixels isn't located in a single byte like it is in 
> SCREEN5.

I can vagely remember there was an issue with VRAM access in SCREEN 7 and 8.
How exactly does it work Maarten? Any information would be appreciated. :-)


Sean


--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html