>However, I learned that European schools teach that Adolf was a insane
>patient and was a devil
I can't talk for all european countries, but I know I did not learn any
such fairytales in school! Even the Germans themselves are quite aware of
the mistake they made back then...
But it's all in the past. The current generation of people don't have to
feel guilty or twist the truth, they just have to make sure it does not
happen again.
>For instance, how many of you knew that Auschwitz facilites were rebuilt
>tourist attractions (I think the destroyed gas chamber was much much
>diabolic that what you can see today however)?
I know, and I think many others know too.
There's nothing wrong with it being a tourist attraction, because it's like
a monument. The WW2-monument on the 'dam' in Amsterdam is a tourist
attraction as well.
>I would like to make my point clear that I hate war probably more than
>average.
I find that hard to believe, because many have seen you try to start a war
more than once.
>Yes, I can definitely predict it will mean something more than what seems
>at this moment.
So you're a fortuneteller now?
>I would like to point one point. Why the April 22 meeting appointed
>"important personage" as participants, despite only a handful were given
>privilege to decide "importance"? I personally understood the decision
>process as a step toward aristocracy.
The organisers simply had to make a selection because the room in which the
meeting was held was quite small. I think the organisers made a good
selection of currently active MSX supporters. Besides, everybody is free to
voice their opinions and ideas for the new MSX.
Think of it more like a press-meeting. Just the press is invited (and not
even all of them) and all other people will hear through them.
Patriek
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
