On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Daniel Jorge Caetano wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 12:17:27 +0900, Takamichi Suzukawa wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >ASCII did not think they needed to negotiate Marat. He never noticed if no
> >one told him.
> >For your notice, Japanese MSX peers did not regard this as "illegal", but
> >they were more offended by the fact ASCII did not develop by their own.
>
> I did not like the fMSX solution (because fMSX is really crappy), but
> I agree with ASCII in starting their based on something that is "on the
> market". I do not think "re-invent the wheel" will help at all.
>
Why is fMSX crappy? It's the #1 UNIX MSX emulator. I've successfully used
it for years. I recently installed it on my DEC Alpha Worksation XL-266
(running a customized Red Hat Linux, 2.2.18 kernel) and it runs all my
games perfectly. The sound is as perfect as can be with a lowly SB-16.
> Just my two cents.
>
> ----- Abra�OS/2, Daniel Caetano
> /| | | |\ Personal: http://www.danielcaetano.com/
> \| ___ |/ OS/2: http://www.quasarbbs.com/daniel/
> \/ ----- \/ MSX: http://www.fudeba.cjb.net/
> | | Nao se compra um relacionamento no supermercado...
> -- -- Mas tambem nao se coloca prazos como em aplicacoes de banco!
>
>
>
> --
> For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
>
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
