Hi,

On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Kirill wrote:

> I've just pushed two patches to mob:
> - minor modifications to build with VS2005;

Your commit messages are not easily readable for me, since they extend 
well over the 76 characters that I can read with the 4-space indent of 
"git log".  Please fix.

Also, you mention that gcc behaves more like VS2005 when two options are 
used; why not add them to the Makefile in the same commit?

Also, reading the patch, I see that we had "char * name" before; I do not 
like that coding style.  I'd rather use the same coding style as in 
git.git, i.e. "char *name".

> - ability to install for the current user only.

I see that you have at least one hard coded path in there:

+"PathToMsys"="c:\\download\\msysgit"

That's not good.  Please imitate what you find in the Makefile, and 
provide an "install-user" target as well as an "install-user.reg.in" 
instead of "install-user.reg".

In general, I think the git development style would be a good procedure to 
follow; post patches here for review, if needed, adjust the patches, and 
repost.  That makes it easier to come up with a patch that is better than 
whatever single developer could have written.

Likewise, don't be afraid of criticising me when you think that I am doing 
something wrong.  As long as you have technical arguments to back that up, 
I am eager to listen.  So, if you find code in git-cheetah that you find 
worthy of improvement, bring it on.

> It did not work with the remote.mob.url, you provided, failing with an
> error: fatal: '/git-cheetah.git': unable to chdir or not a git
> archive. So, I took the Push URL from http://repo.or.cz/w/git-cheetah.git.
> Hopefully, I did not break anything.

Oh, sorry.  I was wrong: the push URL has an extra "/srv/git"...

Ciao,
Dscho

Reply via email to