On Sat, Feb/28/2009 09:22:06AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > I've added my own ideas and organization to the wiki page. > > Ethan / Josh -- want to add anything?
I posted links to client-side and server-side Trac ticket reports. -Ethan > > We should work offline on the GSoC application. > > > On Feb 27, 2009, at 7:59 AM, Mike Dubman wrote: > >> Hello guys, >> >> Using MapReduce or any other in-memory DB techque sounds cool and should >> provide fast access to all perfomance data. >> Here is a wiki page with some ideas for mtt addons: >> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/mtt/wiki/MttNewFeaturesIdeas >> >> >> regards >> >> Mike >> >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: >> Just to bring the info to the list... >> >> There have been some off list e-mails and some in-person discussions about >> a fascinating idea that looks promising here. >> >> How about moving the MTT data store to the Google Apps Engine/datastore? >> See here: >> >> http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/whatisgoogleappengine.html >> >> Josh looked at this about a year ago and thought that there would be some >> interesting possibilities here, but never had the cycles to follow up on >> it. Specifically: if we move all the MTT data from a postgres DB to the >> Google Apps datastore, we might have a highly scalable mechanism for >> queries, and therefore be able to do much more interesting kinds of >> queries (right now, we're fairly limited in our queries because of memory >> and CPU restrictions via Apache/PHP/jpgraph/etc., and also because >> www.open-mpi.org is used for other server purposes). So moving the data >> to the Google Apps datastore *could* give us a better underlying platform. >> >> A further thought is that perhaps we should roll up all the pending ideas >> we have for MTT (and there are a lot of them ;-) -- to include the one >> described above) and apply for a Google Summer of Code student. >> >> http://code.google.com/soc/ >> >> GSoC applications can be submitted March 9-13 2009. This sounds like it >> could be a winner... >> >> Want to start a wiki page with a list of GSoC ideas? >> >> >> >> >> On Feb 24, 2009, at 5:06 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: >> >> On Feb 24, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Josh Hursey wrote: >> >> >> Should we allow direct postgres connections (across the internet) >> >> to specific OMPI organizations who want/need it? >> > >> > It is possible that we could allow read-only access to specific >> > organizations. I would be extremely careful about granting write >> > access. >> >> Agreed; I think we should only allow read-only to specific IP addresses. >> >> It sounds like this *might* solve some of the issues (assuming they >> want to take the time to figure out the schema). Should we explore >> this possibility? >> >> (the SQL schemas are in the MTT SVN repo, if you didn't know that >> already) >> >> -- >> Jeff Squyres >> Cisco Systems >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mtt-devel mailing list >> mtt-de...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-devel >> >> >> -- >> Jeff Squyres >> Cisco Systems >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mtt-devel mailing list >> mtt-de...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-devel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mtt-devel mailing list >> mtt-de...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-devel > > > -- > Jeff Squyres > Cisco Systems > > _______________________________________________ > mtt-devel mailing list > mtt-de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-devel
