--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "fanxb2eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> But Ed does need to give a more balanced view. There are two sides to > most arguments but Ed tends to dwell on the negatives and disregard > the positives in an attempt, I think, to solve the problems that he > sees.
Yes, that is the way I'm looking at it. The positives are just that, positive, and don't need addressing. If Barthez plays amazingly every week we don't need to discuss the goalkeeping situation because ihe's picking himself. However, problems and weaknesses obviously neeed addressing and fixing before they cause irreparable damage. Giggsy is a typical example. Ed burst onto the scene with the > opinion that Giggsy was finished and we should cash in while we still > could. Everybody else thought Giggsy was going through a bad phase and > would regain his form. The majority opinion has (so far) proved to be > correct so what do you now think about Giggsy, Ed? Has he done enough > to make you change your mind? > > Terry No, he hasn't. He put in a great ball for the goal, but over the course of the match did little else. Keane was all over the place, as was van Nistelrooy, and many other players were very influential. I don't altogether blame him as he's out of position and thus isn't playing to his strength. Putting him up front and expecting him to challenge big centre backs in the air is stupid. Anyway, I didn't say Giggs was finished, just that �2m less than Ronaldo was a very good price for him. Ed Subscription info WWW http://red11.org/list Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] = subscribe to the list. [EMAIL PROTECTED] = unsubscribe from the list. Post message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
