Dear all, I had another view at the updated document and find it has been improved by the authors, again ;-) - both concerning some figures and the text. Thanks! I clearly support the advance.
Following Akbars proposal of re-writing the first sentence in ch. 7 perhaps the following might sound ok? Throughout this document the multimob base solution [RFC6224] has been implicitly considered, i.e. both unicast and multicast traffic addressing a mobile node is delivered via the standard PMIPv6 bi-directional tunnel [RFC5213] between LMA and MAG. While here all multicast traffic is assumed to be delivered via the local mobility anchor, the approach described in this document can be also applied to other solutions ... Furthermore I detected few minor typos in addition to Akbar: p.22/25 Prior to acknowledge => Prior to acknowledging p. 26: on behalf of the mobiles nodes => on behalf of the mobile nodes (with Appendix B being out of scope here ;-)) Best regards Dirk From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Behcet Sarikaya Sent: Montag, 15. Juli 2013 18:34 To: [email protected] Subject: [multimob] draft-ietf-multimob-handover-optimization-03 Folks, This message starts a four week Multimob Working Group last call on advancing: Title : PMIPv6 multicast handover optimization by the Subscription Information Acquisition through the LMA (SIAL) Author(s) : Luis M. Contreras Carlos J. Bernardos Ignacio Soto Filename : draft-ietf-multimob-handover-optimization-03.txt Pages : 37 Date : 2013-07-08 as Experimental. Substantive comments and statements of support for advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial suggestions can be sent to the authors. This last call will end on August 9, 2013. Regards, Behcet
_______________________________________________ multimob mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob
