The card is a processor card (TCOS).

Is it correct, that the type of a card (memory or processor) is
indicated by the result (SW1=0x90, SW2=0x00=memory, SW2=0x01=processor)
of the CT command (APDU: 0x20 0x12 0x01 0x00)?
I saw it in a test program (Linux-Magazine 06/2002).

Guido Frohn

-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von sh
Gesendet: Montag, 10. November 2003 11:44
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [Muscle] PCSC vs. CT-API (CT Basic Command Set)

Hello Guido,

what card are you using? PC/SC was originally designed for processor
cards
and not for memory cards. CT-API works with both. This could be the
reason
why your tests work with CT-API and not with PC/SC.

Stefan


Am 10.11.2003 11:16 Uhr schrieb "Guido Frohn" unter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Hi muscle list,
> I'm evaluating CT-API against PCSC for our usage (newbe).
> 
> Card Terminal: Kobil Kaan Pro (v1.04)
> 
> My first try was to make a request ICC (APDU: 0x20 0x12 0x01 0x00) via
> CT-API. The communication is done well and the result is sufficient
> (SW1=0x90, SW2=0x01). The request is part of the CT Basic Command Set
> (CT-BCS).
> 
> Then I have installed the PCSC lite environment to send this APDU
again
> via PCSC. The terminal is dedicated (SCardListReaders, ...)
> successfully, but the answer of the reader is always SW1=0x62,
SW2=0x00,
> which means that the CLA (0x20) is not supported.
> I can't understand this response because the APDU (including the CLA
> 0x20) is working fine in the CT-API environment.
> 
> 
> Again, I'm a newbe in smartcards! So I assume that it must be possible
> to send an APDU (also including CT-BCS) via PCSC and CT-API with the
> same result.
> 
> I'm gratefully for any inspiration.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Mit freundlichen Gr��en,
> Guido Frohn
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Development Engineer
> Compumatica secure networks GmbH
> Germanusstra�e 4
> D-52080 Aachen
> Tel.: +49(0) 241 1696-485
> Fax : +49(0) 241 1696-410
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Muscle mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.musclecard.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle


_______________________________________________
Muscle mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.musclecard.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle


_______________________________________________
Muscle mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.musclecard.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle

Reply via email to