kammi cazze wrote:
> Hi,
> got some errors configuring the developers build of libmusclecard from
> http://web.inf.tu-dresden.de/~ko189283/MuscleCard/
> 
> <snip>
> ...
> checking winscard.h usability... yes
> checking winscard.h presence... no
> configure: WARNING: winscard.h: accepted by the compiler, rejected by
> the preprocessor!
> configure: WARNING: winscard.h: proceeding with the compiler's result
> checking for winscard.h... yes
> checking for SCardEstablishContext in -lpcsclite... yes
> checking for -fvisibility=hidden... no
> ./configure: line 21464: syntax error near unexpected token `AC_DEFINE'
> ./configure: line 21464: `ACX_PTHREAD(AC_DEFINE(HAVE_PTHREAD, 1, [Define
> if you have POSIX threads libraries and header files.]) ,
> AC_MSG_ERROR([POSIX thread support required]))'

What version of automake and autoconf are you using? If it is too old
update it.

> 
> 
> Also, it becomes very confusing al those different packages and
> versions. In other words, i can have 4 different versions of
> libmusclecard i guess, 

No, there are only two version. The cvs is deprecated and should not be
used, but it has the same API as the version contained in SVN. The svn
is at svn.debian.org. And there is only pcsc-lite with the included
libmusclecard. The framework has the same API as the the svn version.
And then there is the development version.

Karsten

> one from the musclecard framework, one from
> pcsc-lite source code, one from cvs and one from the developers build
> (without a version number in the zip title).
> 
> Is it possible to have an overview off all the obsolete or depreciated
> stuff, or put all in the same place with a logical version number?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Pierre
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Muscle mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle

_______________________________________________
Muscle mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle

Reply via email to