kammi cazze wrote: > > > >> From: Karsten Ohme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: MUSCLE <[email protected]> >> To: MUSCLE <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Muscle] libmusclecard configure error. >> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:24:24 +0100 >> >> kammi cazze wrote: >> > Hi, >> > got some errors configuring the developers build of libmusclecard from >> > http://web.inf.tu-dresden.de/~ko189283/MuscleCard/ >> > >> > <snip> >> > ... >> > checking winscard.h usability... yes >> > checking winscard.h presence... no >> > configure: WARNING: winscard.h: accepted by the compiler, rejected by >> > the preprocessor! >> > configure: WARNING: winscard.h: proceeding with the compiler's result >> > checking for winscard.h... yes >> > checking for SCardEstablishContext in -lpcsclite... yes >> > checking for -fvisibility=hidden... no >> > ./configure: line 21464: syntax error near unexpected token `AC_DEFINE' >> > ./configure: line 21464: `ACX_PTHREAD(AC_DEFINE(HAVE_PTHREAD, 1, >> [Define >> > if you have POSIX threads libraries and header files.]) , >> > AC_MSG_ERROR([POSIX thread support required]))' >> >> What version of automake and autoconf are you using? If it is too old >> update it. > > > automake 1.9.6 and autoconf 2.59. Should that be ok?
Yes. Should be OK. You can try to regenerate the configure file with the ./reconf script. Karsten > > Pierre > >> >> > >> > >> > Also, it becomes very confusing al those different packages and >> > versions. In other words, i can have 4 different versions of >> > libmusclecard i guess, >> >> No, there are only two version. The cvs is deprecated and should not be >> used, but it has the same API as the version contained in SVN. The svn >> is at svn.debian.org. And there is only pcsc-lite with the included >> libmusclecard. The framework has the same API as the the svn version. >> And then there is the development version. >> >> Karsten >> >> > one from the musclecard framework, one from >> > pcsc-lite source code, one from cvs and one from the developers build >> > (without a version number in the zip title). >> > >> > Is it possible to have an overview off all the obsolete or depreciated >> > stuff, or put all in the same place with a logical version number? >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Pierre >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Muscle mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Muscle mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle > > > > _______________________________________________ > Muscle mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle _______________________________________________ Muscle mailing list [email protected] http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle
