Le 11/06/2012 16:32, Sebastien Lorquet a écrit :

If you can have a secure channel, why not have it in contact mode too?

I explained why. it can happen that no security module is available, in such cases an appl must abort some tasks (since they will / should be refuse by the chip) if the communication is contactless. I won't list specific cases with lot of details but basic uses of PIV cards as well as BAC protected chips may encounter this issue.

correct me if I'm wrong but what does biometry has to do with PCSC except
nothing? If a card reader also has a fingerprint/whatever sensor then it's a
composite device isn't it?

so the part 10 of the PC/SC standard has nothing to do with PC/SC ?!?

§10 deals with Secure PIN Entry - meaning composite device with card reader(s) and PIN pad; composite devices with reader(s) and fingerprint scanner / sensor could (should?) conform to a PC/SC standard too. (I mean as soon as you consider that plain fingerprint image and / or minutiae should not be present on the (unreliable, intrustable) host).

Sylvain.
_______________________________________________
Muscle mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle

Reply via email to