+1 Richard. Also, speaking for myself, don't mistake my levity for irreverence.
Dave. On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Richard Dobson < richarddob...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > But Theo, music-dsp is not a university list. There is no reason at all to > expect/assume that anyone has any particular qualification, nor even a > "relevant" one. People are doing things here for love of the subject, not > for grade points. They like reading the discussions, even (or perhaps > especially) of subjects they are unfamiliar with at a technical level (such > as myself). Aside from the business of subscribing, it is a public list > which anyone can join (probably not even an age limit). > > And all the PhDs I have met (and that is quite a few) regard their PhDs as > the start of the journey, not the end of it! So, yes, I agree that modesty > from a PhD is always good to see! > > Richard Dobson > > > > On 13/11/2013 16:54, Theo Verelst wrote: > >> I must say that where I received my (at the time) top level education, >> the PhD's had much higher standards concerning human modesty and >> theoretical respect. >> >> > -- > dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website: > subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, > dsp links > http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp > http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp > -- dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website: subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp links http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
