On 23/07/15 20:54, Charles Z Henry wrote:
*snores*
Please have a civil conversation, and don't feed the trolls. If this
isn't fun, what's it good for?
A simple rhyme to remember: Make it moot and don't refute!
Nobody reads every email on a mailing list. If you have a personal
problem, consider a technical solution: email filtering
Please spare the rest of us from your flaming.
Theo's comment was unacceptable and has no place on a mailing list such
as this - filters or no. I would have been far less civil in my response.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Peter S <peter.schoffhau...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 23/07/2015, Theo Verelst <theo...@theover.org> wrote:
I'm not answering much to treacherous psychopaths (from the use of words
and the content of the communication here, anyway)
Okay, I think this was the last case when I tried to teach you
anything about digital signal processing or waste my valuable time to
try to demonstrate some DSP processes to those small handful of
readers who read these threads.
Good luck figuring out the mysteries of DSP, learning what dithering
and noise shaping is, etc. You clearly don't need the advice of
"psychopaths", you can learn all that without me as well.
Best regards,
Peter
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
