On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 02:52:44PM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen via Mutt-dev wrote: > as i said in the issue arnt is referring to, the correct way to handle > things is to add labels which indicate the issue type and the importance. > one can go beyond that and have explicit needinfo, helpwanted, etc. labels. > there is no shortage of projects which demonstrate that.
Just how complicated do we want to make this issue tracker? Isn't this whole discussion being blown out of proportion? Mutt is a mail client, not an operating system, and it's a mature email client at that. Are we really getting feature requests that require such an in depth and regimented approach? Can't we just keep a list of ideas and suggestions that nobody has yet written code to implement, and mail it to the list once a month? Move the responsibilty to keep the idea 'at the top of the pile' to the person who submitted it in the first place.
