Edmund, In my first tests this worked great. My original change was after this, trying to 'eat up' the next input. But that didn't work nicely. This, however seems to do what I was looking for just fine. Thanks, Kurt On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 03:16:13PM +0000, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I think if there was an option which would cause commands on tagged > > messages (initiated with ;) to simply do nothing if there was no tagged > > message, then it might work. > > It looks like curs_main.c:550 in my copy of mutt here, where it says: > > if (!Context->tagged) > { > mutt_error _("No tagged messages."); > continue; > } >
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... brian moore
- Re: New Mail Sent to different ... Charles Cazabon
- Re: New Mail Sent to different ... David DeSimone
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Scott V. McGuire
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Charles Cazabon
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Jeremy Blosser
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes brian moore
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Matthew Hawkins
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Kurt
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Mikko Hänninen
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Nick Jennings
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Shawn D. McPeek
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Nick Jennings
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailb... Jorge Godoy
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Jorge Godoy
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailb... Morten Bo Johansen
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Dan Lipofsky
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes brian moore
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Nick Jennings