Edmund,

In my first tests this worked great. My original change was after this,
trying to 'eat up' the next input. But that didn't work nicely. This,
however seems to do what I was looking for just fine.

Thanks,

Kurt

On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 03:16:13PM +0000, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 
> > I think if there was an option which would cause commands on tagged
> > messages (initiated with ;) to simply do nothing if there was no tagged
> > message, then it might work.
> 
> It looks like curs_main.c:550 in my copy of mutt here, where it says:
> 
>       if (!Context->tagged)
>       {
>         mutt_error _("No tagged messages.");
>         continue;
>       }
> 

Reply via email to