* Tim Guirgies <[email protected]> [2011-06-07 03:57:37 +1000]:
> > > Can you please tell me the exact sequence you use to try to sign a
> > > message?
> >
> > Compose/reply to a piece of mail, esc:x to save it, I get moved to the
> > post-reply window. From there 'p', 'a' to Sign As, it asks for my KEY ID,
> Can you try using 'p', then 's'?
I tried this before (on the list I think) and when I was trying to get the
same help from some tanacious fellow users from freenode/#mutt. It didn't work,
but I will try again to see if something changed.
'p', 's' added the following to my headers
Security: Sign (PGP/MIME)
sign as: 0xeecd9a84d5b20c0c
it still failed w/ the bad passphrase error I pasted earlier.
> Did you close and open my message after receiving the key? And can you
> make sure you got my key by doing "gpg2 --list-keys"?
Yes, I even went as far as to restart mutt, I still don't see verified
signature
in any mail. What I do see at the top is the following:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Mon Jun 6 19:17:56 2011) --]
gpg: Signature made Mon Jun 6 13:03:10 2011 EDT using RSA key ID BE773416
gpg: Good signature from "Tim Guirgies <[email protected]>"
gpg: aka "Tim Guirgies <[email protected]>"
gpg: aka "Tim Mazid (Current name; due to be changed
02/10/2011.) <[email protected]>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 2BED 9795 BB73 C716 A572 7292 6368 6B6A BE77 3416
[-- End of PGP output --]
[-- The following data is signed --]
..
...
..
[-- End of signed data --]
In retrospect, I think this may have been what you were talking about
and I just didn't understand what I was looking at yet. I admit, I was
looking explicitly for "Signature Verified".
> However, it seems to me like gpg and mutt aren't talking to each
> properly. We'll see after you try 'p' 's'.
I was rolling that thought around my head all day, but I didn't know
where to go with it.
--
> A: Yes.
> >Q: Are you sure?
> >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
