* Chris Brennan <[email protected]> [2011-06-06 19:27:03 -0400]:

> * Tim Guirgies <[email protected]> [2011-06-07 03:57:37 +1000]:
> 
> > > > Can you please tell me the exact sequence you use to try to sign a
> > > > message?
> > > 
> > > Compose/reply to a piece of mail, esc:x to save it, I get moved to the 
> > > post-reply window. From there 'p', 'a' to Sign As, it asks for my KEY ID,
> > Can you try using 'p', then 's'?
> 
> I tried this before (on the list I think) and when I was trying to get the 
> same help from some tanacious fellow users from freenode/#mutt. It didn't 
> work,
> but I will try again to see if something changed.
> 
> 'p', 's' added the following to my headers
> 
>     Security: Sign (PGP/MIME)
>     sign as: 0xeecd9a84d5b20c0c
> 
> it still failed w/ the bad passphrase error I pasted earlier.
> 
> 
> > Did you close and open my message after receiving the key?  And can you
> > make sure you got my key by doing "gpg2 --list-keys"?
> 
> Yes, I even went as far as to restart mutt, I still don't see verified 
> signature 
> in any mail. What I do see at the top is the following:
> 
> [-- PGP output follows (current time: Mon Jun  6 19:17:56 2011) --]
> gpg: Signature made Mon Jun  6 13:03:10 2011 EDT using RSA key ID BE773416
> gpg: Good signature from "Tim Guirgies <[email protected]>"
> gpg:                 aka "Tim Guirgies <[email protected]>"
> gpg:                 aka "Tim Mazid (Current name; due to be changed 
> 02/10/2011.) <[email protected]>"
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
> Primary key fingerprint: 2BED 9795 BB73 C716 A572  7292 6368 6B6A BE77 3416
> [-- End of PGP output --]
> 
> [-- The following data is signed --]
> ..
> ...
> ..
> [-- End of signed data --]
> 
> In retrospect, I think this may have been what you were talking about 
> and I just didn't understand what I was looking at yet. I admit, I was
> looking explicitly for "Signature Verified". 
> 
> > However, it seems to me like gpg and mutt aren't talking to each
> > properly.  We'll see after you try 'p' 's'.
> 
> I was rolling that thought around my head all day, but I didn't know
> where to go with it.
> 
> -- 
> > A: Yes.
> > >Q: Are you sure?
> > >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> > >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

I'm out of idea's now ... I still can't sign mail, so I don't know if I have
the wrong configuration somewhere or if it's mutt/gpg not talking for some
reason. Either way, this is still unresolved.


-- 
> A: Yes.
> >Q: Are you sure?
> >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
> http://xkcd.com/84/
> GPG: D5B20C0C (6741 8EE4 6C7D 11FB 8DA8  9E4A EECD 9A84 D5B2 0C0C)

Reply via email to