On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 08:02:39AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 09:53:17AM +0100, Scott Stevenson wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 06:56:46AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 06:46:11PM +0100, Scott Stevenson wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 07:52:57PM +0530, dexter wrote:
> > > > > ...
> easier to use mutt without it. Unfortunately installing mutt-patched
> installed /usr/bin/mutt-patched but overwrote /usr/bin/mutt to be a soft
> link to mutt-patched. I had to uninstall mutt-patched and then reinstall
> mutt to get rid of the sidebar. Back to normal now.
> 

Under Debian you could run 

      sudo update-alternatives --config mutt

to choose which mutt (patched or not) to run by default. I guess that
Ubuntu is similar. Thus, it was not really necessary to
uninstall/reinstall in order to test and choose among the two mutt versions. Of
course, you already did...
Best regards,
Luis


-- 

                                                                  o
W. Luis Mochán,                      | tel:(52)(777)329-1734     /<(*)
Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, UNAM  | fax:(52)(777)317-5388     `>/   /\
Apdo. Postal 48-3, 62251             |                           (*)/\/  \
Cuernavaca, Morelos, México          | [email protected]   /\_/\__/
GPG: DD344B85,  2ADC B65A 5499 C2D3 4A3B  93F3 AE20 0F5E DD34 4B85


Reply via email to