[--------- Wed 20.Mar'13 at 18:08:49 -0500 David Champion :---------]
> * On 20 Mar 2013, Chris Green wrote:
> >
> > Has the mutt handling of this changed in the last few versions?
>
> Not that I know of, and I doubt it.
>
> > The python way of doing this is correct according to the RFC as far as I
> > can tell, there *should* be a blank line between the end of a message
> > and the 'From ' starting the next message. Thus the python library I'm
> > using does add this blank line.
> >
> > However mutt detects this as an error and outputs the messsage about the
> > mailbox being modified.
>
> There absolutely should be a blank line. I think though that the order
> is wrong: mutt expects that a message (i.e. a From_ line) appears at
> the old EOF marker, and that the EOF marker is on/after a blank line.
> I think that if you adjust your filter to write the message and then a
> blank line instead of a blank line and then a message, the error will go
> away.
>
> --
> David Champion • d...@bikeshed.us
Chris, do you have a site where this python script is viewable? just so
we can see how it works. It might help clarify the issue and of course
it's interesting to see how people have come with ideas and used
languages/scripts to handle mail.
Jamie
--
James Griffin: jmz at kontrol.kode5.net
jmzgriffin at gmail.com
A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38
