On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 06:45:46PM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 05:30:16PM +0100, Óscar Pereira wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > The subject seems pretty self-explanatory. Use case, you're writing > > an email, which is already marked as to be sent encrypted, but you > > have to postpone it. In the meantime offlineimap runs and syncs you > > mailboxes, and thus your mail which is to be sent encrypted ends up > > in (say) Gmail's remote folder -- UNencrypted. > > This seems like an offlineimap issue, rather than anything to do with > mutt.
It really isn't. If you wanted the message to be encrypted, there's no good reason to save it on the local disk unencrypted. Mutt, for example, does not decrypt incoming messages and then re-save them unencrypted, nor would you typically want that. If it's sensitive enough to be encrypted outgoing, it's sensitive enough to be encrypted on disk... even if you haven't actually sent it yet. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
pgpql4hiswuk5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
